Nevada Water Science Center


Evapotranspiration Studies in Nevada

Contact Information

Mike Moreo
Hydrologist
Phone: (702) 564-4625
Email:

 

Mailing Address
USGS
Nevada Water Science Center
160 N. Stephanie St.
Henderson, NV 89074

 

Nevada Water Science Center
Information

Home Page Surface Water Groundwater Water Quality Research Contact Us

 

 

Yucca Forest

Site identification: 363111115094801

Study contact: Michael Moreo

ET Data

Annual ET reported (in inches): 6.6

Study period: 6/07/09 - 6/06/10

Days recorded: 896 from 1/01/08 to 6/15/10

 

Measurement method: Bowen ratio

Data: Download from NWISWeb

Graph of ET data

Location information

Latitude,
in decimal degrees
Longitude,
in decimal degrees
Altitude
36.51972222 -115.1633333 5510

 

Photo of ET site

 

ET Source Area

Joshua trees

 

Study Information

Precipitation, potential evapotranspiration, and actual evapotranspiration often are used to characterize the hydroclimate of a region. Quantification of these parameters in mountainous terrains is difficult because limited access often hampers the collection of representative ground data. To fulfill a need to characterize ecological zones in the Spring Mountains and Sheep Range of southern Nevada, spatially and temporally explicit estimates of these hydroclimatic parameters are determined from remote–sensing and model–based methodologies. Parameter–elevation Regressions on Independent Slopes Model (PRISM) precipitation estimates for this area ranges from about 100 millimeters (mm) in the low elevations of the study area (700 meters [m]) to more than 700 mm in the high elevations of the Spring Mountains (> 2,800 m). The PRISM model underestimates precipitation by 7—15 percent based on a comparison with four high–elevation precipitation gages having more than 20 years of record. Precipitation at 3,000–m elevation is 50 percent greater in the Spring Mountains than in the Sheep Range. The lesser amount of precipitation in the Sheep Range is attributed to partial moisture depletion by the Spring Mountains of eastward–moving, cool–season (October–April) storms. Cool–season storms account for 66—76 percent of annual precipitation. Potential evapotranspiration estimates by the Basin Characterization Model range from about 700 mm in the high elevations of the Spring Mountains to 1,600 mm in the low elevations of the study area. The model realistically simulates lower potential evapotranspiration on northeast–to–northwest facing slopes compared to adjacent southeast–to–southwest facing slopes. Actual evapotranspiration, estimated using a Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer based water–balance model, ranges from about 100 to 600 mm. The magnitude and spatial variation of simulated, actual evapotranspiration was validated by comparison to PRISM precipitation. Estimated groundwater recharge, computed as the residual of precipitation depleted by actual evapotranspiration, is within the range of previous estimates. A climatic water deficit dataset and aridity–index–based climate zones are derived from precipitation and evapotranspiration datasets. Climate zones range from arid in the lower elevations of the study area to humid in small pockets on north– to northeast–facing slopes in the high elevations of the Spring Mountains. Correlative analyses between hydroclimatic variables and mean ecosystem elevations indicate that the climatic water deficit is the best predictor of ecosystem distribution (R2 = 0.92). Computed water balances indicate that substantially more recharge is generated in the Spring Mountains than in the Sheep Range. A geospatial database containing compiled and developed hydroclimatic data and other pertinent information accompanies this report.

 

Study Publication: SIR2014-5142

 

 

 

Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

Take Pride in America logo USA.gov logo U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
Page Contact Information: Nevada Water Science Center Web Team
Page Last Modified: January 21, 2016 -->